Hair is this emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we wish we can’t have and what we have we don’t want! Wild hair and we wish straight, straight hair and we wish curly, brunette and we wish blonde, blonde and we wish red. Likewise upper lip hair on a female, so valued as a sign of exquisite beauty using areas of the planet, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is really a common problem affecting the majority of women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the use of various temporary types of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it is often followed closely by feelings of poor self-confidence, a sense of isolation and low self worth.
Because the times when bearded feamales in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to eliminate any trace of hair from any and every part of these body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it is not just women which are now affected… increasingly the male gender is susceptible to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair can be just like vilified by the male population nowadays whilst the female.
Different Methods of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth can be due to many factors, such as for example, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the only real permanent way of hair removal, is a treatment that’s in great demand by female and transsexual clients and now, due to society’s attitudes, the number of male clients is increasing.
To meet up this need there as been many hair removal measures some that go back centuries in history. Hair removal has been around since caveman times but interestingly the areas of the human body we are removing hair from have differed over the ages. Removing hair from the top and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes however for survival. There’s evidence that cavemen did this but in addition the ancient Egyptians and it was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the top would eliminate the advantage of an adversary having anything to seize onto as well as having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. In fact these women removed most of these body hair, with the exception of eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It had been also considered uncivilized for men to possess hair on their face. Undesired facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of an individual of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a form of razors made from flint or bronze whilst the razor wasn’t invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
In addition they used a method of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) would be put on your skin, a reel of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – the same of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There is also another technique used called threading which is recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn would be placed through the fingers of your hands, and quickly stroked over the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. During the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of these eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads in order to give the looks of an extended brow and forehead was fashionable. It is startling to notice the obvious influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from the beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are typical temporary methods that numerous people try today. In fact new hair removal devices seem to seem like buses – every 20 minutes or so! However, technology has shifted and with it, it seems there are some restricted and doubtful types of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods have been in a restricted category as the former has been banned in some countries such as the USA and the latter are merely in experimental stages. Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are a few of the doubtful methods in that there surely is no established data on their effectiveness.
Electrolysis continues to be the only real proven permanent way of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited out of this tried and trusted treatment. It is usually the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a remarkable transformation inside their clients, from a timid, introverted personality at the start of a program of treatments, to a confident and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ within our Western society is a multiple million pound industry. This type of huge money making machine though could have a lot more than its fair share of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none that relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its fair share of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are generally permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this specific in mind there’s just one system in the marketplace today that could totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because of its longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that’s electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for several hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It remains utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting the hospital laser hair removal departments. It can also be considered an important tool in the job of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It gives cosmetic relief for the customer with mild hirsute problems to the in-patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require much time of treatment.
Apparently there’s been confusing messages from the re
gulatory bodies on definitions of what what ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached when the hairs which were removed don’t grow back for an amount of 12 months after the past treatment, permanent reduction can be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains to this day, usually the one method legally permitted to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as for example LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for several permanent hair removal. This, it is now realised, reaches best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The stark reality is that this was wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are more realistic. The reality is that whilst they have their successes there is also their limitations – they cannot treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ although not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The reality is this newer technology is brilliant for large areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it just simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there’s no melanin remaining in the hair for this to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not most of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The rest of the 5% – 15% hair is going to be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but nonetheless stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the only real option of ‘permanent hair removal’ down seriously to additional electrolysis treatment to perform the job. Laser and IPL are actually recognised to be always a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators use a burst of filtered light aimed at one hair at a time. Following the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light utilized in the unit is targeted against the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. Allow this technique, fibre-optic probes were inserted in to the hair follicle through that the light was flashed. There’s no clinical data published to date to guide any permanency claims and there’s no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method using its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was initially patented in 1959. This system works by passing an electric current through the tweezers, which holds the hair on the surface of your skin by grasping them for a number of minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. 脫毛優惠 The scientific community has reservations whilst the claim of electricity destroying the root of the hair does not have any scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published currently to establish the declare that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the use of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches in place of cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the notion of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the use of a needle. A DC electric current is passed through a conductive gel on the surface of your skin via an adhesive patch placed on the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the electric current that travels down seriously to the hair follicle.
Up to now no clinical data can be acquired and the laws of physics don’t support the claims created by the manufacturers. Hair does not conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it’ll spread along the surface of your skin as opposed to passing through the hair. Therefore, much like the tweezer method, the argument so it will reach the root of the hair to destroy it does not have any scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the process they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It is stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into your skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as the ‘next generation of long term hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material it is ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in the same follicle proving that this can be a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA has not given the outcome currently regarding a software to promote in April 2010 of the most recent device.